Showing posts with label gay science fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gay science fiction. Show all posts

Thursday, July 1, 2010

MNDSPACE ... in paperback!


If you've been waiting for MINDSPACE to be available in paperback -- today's the day you've been holding out for. The proof arrived this morning, and the book is available direct from the manufacturer:

MINDSPACE
Author: Mel Keegan
Cover: Jade
Publisher: DreamCraft
95,000 words
248 pages
Price in paperback: $21.50
(plus p&h)
Buy now in paperback *



(* this link takes you to the manufacturer's site. Purchases made there are much more lucrative to me and to DreamCraft, and right now we have an agreement: funds beyond what we'd earn from a sale via Amazon will be donated to GLBT Bookshelf. So you can support the Bookshelf without even realizing you're doing it. And ... thank you kindly for same.)

MINDSPACE is also available as an ebook in the PDF format for PC or Mac, desktop or Laptop. (Due in July 2010: files designed specifically to suit iLiad, iPad, iPhone, Sony, Pam BeBook and Kindle).


as a PDF for desktop, laptop, PC&Mac


Click here to read the full blurb; and

click here to read the sample chapters.

CAVEAT: Be aware that the book is a sexy sf romp in which same-gender sensuality, realistic violence and coarse language render the text unsuitable for younger readers. For big kids -- it's a blast.



Readers who bought MINDSPACE also bought...

PLEASE CLICK THE LINKS BELOW to go directly to the specific pages -- thanks!

AQUAMARINE GROUND ZERO DEATH'S HEAD

All Mel Keegan's titles are included in the benefit plan outlined above for Mindspace, so by buying MK SF via these links, you can support GLBT Bookshelf, and the GLBT publishing, writing and reading community, without even being aware that you've made a handsome donation -- and The Bookshelf thanks you kindly!

Thursday, June 10, 2010

New Mel Keegan Novel ... new cover ... wow!


What ... a new Mel Keegan book? Surely you jest! But no ... the book is launching in a few days, it's called MINDSPACE, and to prove it, here's the cover. The fantastic new cover. Wow. Jade has worked miracles on this. Have you seen the Adventures in 3D blog lately?!

I haven't blogged in months now -- I just don't have the time. In fact, there's so many things to talk about, one hardly knows where to begin...

So we'll make a start with the launch of my new book, plus a quick update on the HELLGATE series, and I'll just make the time somehow to blog about all manner of things -- the state of the industry, the shape of iPads to come, gay news, and a lot more.

Am I back -- will I be blogging daily, as I used to? Well, not if you want HELLGATE finished by the end of 2010! The work ahead of me is still looking like a hiking holiday through the Himalayas. In winter. But I've knocked a good dent in what needed to be done and there are still six months left. So -- we'll call this an update on how the series is going: nicely. Stay tuned. Take nothing for granted. Expect the unexpected. Don't applaud, throw money...

So what's MINDSPACE about? Well, I'll share that in another post because I just used up the entire 11.27 minute window for posting to this blog, and I have to run! I'll give you few hints right here: gay science fiction, transhumanism, gaming, revenge, survival, technology, love, war. And that's a potent mix.

Cheers,
Mel

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Jarrat and Stone are back ... and I'm stunned

Words fail me. I mean ... words ... just ... fail. What can I say? Have a look at these, and be amazed:

Ooof. It's like looking at stills from the movie. These are two "renders" out of a set of 10, all of which are online at Jade's Adventures in 3D -- and they're also uploaded at about twice this size, so go ahead, click the pic to see the larger shot. The Jarrat renders went up first, telling a scene from his POV. The Stone renders went up yesterday, telling the same scene from his POV.

They leave my fingers itching to write NARC. And I can't, because I'm churning my way steadily through Hellgate, and 2010 is about getting that whole series finished. This is sheer, unmitigated torture! I ask myself, could I possibly squeeze in a Jarrat-and-Stone short piece, something "only" around 50,000 words or so? In fact, there *is* a story which has been slated to be the high-action prologue to the next NARC novel -- and you all know what happened last time I did this. STOPOVER was supposed to be the opening "kaboom" for APHELION, and it ended up being taken right out and published on its own, because at 45,000 words it was a) too long to be an opening act, b) would have pushed the overall length of APHELION to 230,000 words, which is monstrous; and c) was quite large enough to be published as a pocket-size thriller.

Hence, I find myself literally, and enthusiastically, adrool ... and asking the question in all seriousness: can I squeeze in a NARC short, if I work, very very hard, fueled by the rush of seeing these pictures?

Stay tuned!

And please do link over to Jade's blog, where pictures like this are commonplace, what's more, she'll tell you how to do it yourself:

Cheers,
Mel

Monday, January 11, 2010

ICE, WIND & FIRE -- five stars at Rainbow Reviews!

Many thanks to Rainbow Reviews for reviewing the twentieth anniversary reissue of ICE, WIND AND FIRE, and it's my pleasure to report ... five stars!

Here's the complete review: http://www.rainbow-reviews.com/?p=4141

Brilliant ... I'm gratified -- delighted!

Now, if the proof copy of the paperback would just be delivered. And I know it's Christmas holding everything up, but it's 10 January already and patience is wearing thin.

While I'm on the subject of thanking people vastly for their input, feedback and assistance, I must thank Jade yet again, for the most amazing NARC visualizations! Have you seen these:

Capt. Kevin Jarrat

Capt. R.J. "Stoney" Stone

Sgt. J.C. "Gil" Cronin: and look at the unit badge!!

Sgt. J.C. "Gil" Cronin displays the descant squad's much vaunted physique!

I'm reliably informed that the next character to be tackled head-on is Harry, and I can't wait to see this. Makes my fingers itch to get back into these books. However, I just picked up the threads of HELLGATE, and am promising myself that I'll go right through both books without letting myself be diverted again. (This should have been the plan for 2009, but GLBT Bookshelf came along, and the rest is history.)

So ... massive thanks to Jade, whose blog/site has developed into one of the most gloriously beautiful sites on the web: http://3d-adventures.blogspot.com/ ... and to Rainbow Reviews for a wonderful review of ICE, WIND AND FIRE!

Cheers,

Mel

Thursday, December 10, 2009

New blog launching ... new cover art inspiring me!

Two items I *must* blog about today -- though I know I haven't blogged in a loooong time; too busy, folks; only so many hours in a day!

But -- two things to blog about today!

GLBT Bookshelf has just launched its fiction wing ... free gay fiction, online, glbt romance in any of its thousands of permutations: ALL GAY ROMANCE is launching at this time. There's quite a nice range of fiction online even now, and it's very early days as yet. A good time is being had by all, and we hope readers will soon find the site, bookmark is, and return often.

The other piece of news is personal: I just received the cover proof for my next-up novel, and to say that I'm thrilled to bits is a terrible understatement:







Will you take a look at that! It's by Jade ... who else?! ... and it was done in the new 3D art prog to which I intriduced the artist back in August. I'm still trying to figure out my specular from my ambient --! Jade, meanwhile, is doing stuff like this:





Is that amazing, or what? One of the best things about this is that Jade actually tells you how to do this stuff ... not in any great detail, of course, because these are not tutorials. But enough to point me in the right direction, and give me have a clue about where the tools are!

And I guess, now that the cover art for MINDSPACE is done and waiting for me, I better get on and finish the story! It's about 75% done, I just need to find the time to hammer out the rest of it and then send it over to DreamCraft for the edit and proof phase ... and somewhere along the line, maybe I'll find the time to blog again!

Cheers,
Mel



Monday, September 28, 2009

Ground Zero: five stars!

Lovely news to start off the day: GROUND ZERO has just been given a five-star review at Rainbow Reviews ... am "tickled pink" as you'd expect. Hence the blog post! So --

Here's the review;
and
Here's the book itself (which is available in about 20 ebook formats, and is due in paperback next month, via Amazon, Target OnLine and so forth).

In other news, ICE, WIND AND FIRE is virtually through the OCR process, and (this is where it gets exciting) the cover is being designed at this moment.

I'm also "in talks" with DreamCraft to become an editor with them in 2010. They're slowly, sloooooowly, making the changeover from multimedia studio to publisher -- apparently there's more money and less gray hair and stomach ulcers in online publishing than in multimedia (big "duh" factor there). Stay tuned for developments ...!

Cheers,
Mel

Sunday, September 13, 2009

GROUND ZERO - Launching now!

2048: the city of Adelaide – the capital of South Australia – has grown, developed, changed. The population has doubled, and the city’s livelihood is high technology. A new university has grown up since the Twenties – Franklin University, in the hills above the city. It’s the home to Doctor Robert Strachan’s Paranormal Studies department, where Lee Ronson and Brendan Scott head the data analysis team.

They’re the best in a difficult business, and they’ll be tested to their limits in an assignment handed to Strachan by Metro’s most senior criminologist, DCS Maggie Jarmin.

It’s winter when the city suffers a series of bizarre murders, robberies at high-tech labs – and a virus which sprang from nowhere. Every two days, a fresh body is discovered … entirely drained of blood. Every two days, a weapons research or energy technologies facility is robbed of a seemingly bizarre list of oddments. Meanwhile, the virus known only by a codename – 2048-3a – is so new, no part of the community is immune and the city is crippled.

Murders, robberies and virus are intimately connected in a mystery that will astonish. Lee Ronson and Brendan Scott find themselves taking point in an investigation filled with unexpected hazard – and equally unforeseen reward.

Sexy very-near-future gay action/adventure from the pen of the maestro.

Read the first 10% of the novel, free!
(Caveat: material in this free sample is not suitable for juniors. Consider youreself warned!)

Novel length: 103,000 words
Rated: R (18+; sex, violence, language)
ISBN: 978-0-9807092-0-9
Publication date: September, 2009
Publisher: DreamCraft.
Price: $9.99 - ebook; $19.95 - paper (due)
Cover: Jade

Current availability: eBook, in many formats. Paperback: due at Amazon in October 2009


eBook as PDF for iLiad, BeBook; PDB for Sony reader and iPhone; MOB for Mobipocket reader and Kindle; LRF for Sony Reader.


 For iPhone, smartphone, Sony, Palm, Mobi, Blackberry...


 Kindle ebook: $9.99


eBook for PC/Mac -- $9.99:  Add to Cart


eBook for Screenreaders -- $9.99:  Add to Cart



Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Sneak preview!

Today it's "welcome to a different kind of book launch."

In fact, this is the sneak preview, for readers of this blog only. The launch itself will be via newsletter tomorrow.

LEGENDS is up, it's ready, and it's open. The first eight or nine thousand words are online, plus a lot of artwork, housed in one of the most amazing templates I've ever seen. You'd hardly believe it was a blog, and you'd never guess it was working under the Blogger engine.

Here's the url to the LEADER page -- remember, being a blog it will always have the latest post up first! But if you book mark this url, you'll always hit the "cover" of the book! Here is is:

http://mel-keegan-legends.blogspot.com/2009/01/1.html



Notice that there are tabs across the top of the page (and THAT is a feat of magic in Blogger) which give you access to the Complete Contents, as well as a other stuff. The Complete Contents is just that: the direct link to every segment as it's posted, in order, identified by its title.

You can also navigate by a simple "chapter list" that's building in the left column; and you can page-forward and page-back from the top and bottom of each chapter/post. If you do get lost (and it won't be easy, because the navigation is too obvious!) go home to the Complete Contents from the tab-bar across the top of the page.

Lastly, where it says "Chapter Five is due tomorrow" ... well, this is the sneak preview. Chapter Five will actually be up a day after the site opens "to the public." Regulars on this blog are a special kind of "in group" with due privileges.

The rest of the Mel-o-Sphere is fairly dull: it's all about narrowly avoiding the hospital (not me personally), house cleaning, and being confounded by the prejudice you find in the oddest places --

In putting together the LEGENDS site, obviously it's "monetized" because the novel itself is free. So I've been looking around for an ad-server that would load a banner onto the page and pay whatever fee per thousand page impressions -- you know how it works.

I'm sure there are companies out there who would do this, but long before I found one which will work with me, I checked out the banner ad serving company that comes most highly recommended (seemed like a good place to start) and was both stunned and disgusted.

They have a problem with blogs, for a start: probably because blogs have the ability to be flexible, ephemeral, always changing, and content is uploaded so fast -- they can't hope to monitor (censor, filter, object to, haggle over) what's published. They have a problem with FOREIGN sites ...meaning, anything outside North America. They have a problem with sites that have anything to do with, or are linked to, sites about "different sexual orientation." They also have a problem with sites dealing with religion ... and on, and on.

The prejudice displayed by such a company is beyond comprehension. They come highly recommended by (surprise) American blogging pundits --

But what if you're "foreign," or Hundu, or (good grief!) GLBTI? You're persona non grata. These people refuse to serve ads to anyone who's not PLU -- heterosexual North Americans who either don't mention religion, or toe the (Republican) party line. Dominionists? Fine and dandy. Wiccan or Taoist or Hindu? I imagine they believe we're all going to burn.

Not good enough, people.I clicked out and passed on. At this point, LEGENDS is carrying Google ads, Amazon affiliate stuff, iPower and Serif (which we know inside out, can vouch for and recommend) and that's about it. I'm still hunting for an ad server without the incredible prejudice. Might take a look at Gay Ad Network. And when the traffic on LEGENDS has built up to a healthy torrent, Blog Ads should start to look attractive.

The experiment begins! Look out for a newsletter tomorrow, and I'll keep you posted as to results.

Speaking of results, it's interesting to note that the Amazon affiliate links actually do sell items. It works out to something like 10 items sold through about 2500 page impressions ... in other words, every 250 page loads, someone, somewhere, buys a book, a DVD, a CD, a jump drive, an SD card, whatever.

And of course this is the core of the experiment: can you give the book away and make enough "on the side" for the author to be reimbursed? Let's find out!

Ciao for now,
MK

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Gay publishing: interesting trends!

I got myself into a discussion the other week, and found myself defending an indefensible position. My point was that gay science fiction was a viable marketplace; the man said, although he said it kindly, "Keegan, the squirrels have made off with that peanut you call a brain, you just haven't noticed it's gone yet."

Well, I was mildly perturbed about this. I think I'd notice if my brain had been purloined by fuzzy-tailed rodents --

Also, I still believe gay science fiction is a viable medium ... although I admit, the evidence to the contrary is stacking up alarmingly.

When's the last time you looked at the Alyson Books online catalog? I just did, and the stats are alarming. Alyson Books have their finger on the pulse. They read the market keenly -- they've survived decades in a publishing environment that'd have a warthog shot, skinned and on the barbie before you can blink. So you can confidently use their catalog as a barometer. They've done the research; all a smart-alec like Keegan has to do is interpret the stats.

Their catalog is very neatly organized into categories, which made it easy to derive these data:

General gay and lesbian fiction: 27 titles
Gay studies: 28 titles
Gay (male) romance: 4 titles
Gay science fiction: 3 titles (all lesbian; a series)
Gay (male only) erotica: 35 titles

(Verify the stats for yourself here: http://www.alysonbooks.com/gay-literature.html)

Uh ... huh. That's 97 titles in all -- close enough to 100 to round it up and make the rest of the math a piece of cake.

A third of all gay books fall into the porn bracket. The porn outsells general gay fiction by better than 25%. It outsells gay science fiction by a factor of almost 12:1 ... while gay SF accounts for about 3% of what's being published; and none is gay male. There's no gay fantasy in the list at all. To make the point even more poignantly, porn outsells romance by a factor of about 9:1 ...

Loooooooong pause for reflection.

Can't say I wasn't warned! Times have changed.

When Ice, Wind and Fire came out in 1990 it was called raunchy, and I copped hell from a number of critics, one of whom said he sincerely hoped it would be Mr. Keegan's last book. These days, there's nothing noticeably raunchy about IWF, and even if there were, this quality would simply plunk the novel into the top-selling bracket!

I find it interesting to see the way the market has swung in the last 20 years -- since, say, 1980, when Richard Dipple at GMP was asking for and approving rewrites on IWF. Go back ten years earlier, and you had writers tippy-toeing around their sensual scenes, trying to say "the two guys jumped in the shower and bonked their brains out," without actually saying this.

These days? Gay publishing is heading in a curious direction. If the trend continues, you soon won't be able to give away a gay novel if it doesn't sizzle with candidly-stated sensuality! This is not necessarily a bad thing -- but it's a curious trend, in a world where you have TV networks still refusing to show Torchwood, and quoting, as their reason, the gay sensually of it all...

Not so long ago, publishers were saying that the "crossover" novel was something like the holy grail of publishing: a novel that was gay enough to interest gay readers, but underwritten enough to be acceptable to the mainstream market.

Well ... I think the goalposts just moved, all by themselves. Gay readers seem -- as an observation based on the data! -- to want sizzling-hot seduction scenes, while the mainstream audience isn't even ready to accept Torchwood and the new independently filmed Trek episode with the gay storyline.

Which means the "crossover" novel, like the holy grail, is more elusive and impossible than ever. Let the market mature through another decade or two, and see if the mainstream catches up with us! (Good golly, I'll be how old by then?!!)

Got to go back to work, guys. Let me know what you think of the Infolinks which are appearing in the text now. Leave a comment if you have something to say!

Ciao for now,
MK

Friday, January 2, 2009

The long Trek out of homophobia ain't over yet, apparently

Welcome to 2009 ... and business as usual. The new harddrive is on and working, even as I type this: the gizmos are backing up about 100GB of stored stuff into a corner of the Tb space. Nice. Gives one the illusion of being in control (the truth being very different).

I was wandering around on the Internet a couple of days ago, following links to and from who knows where, and came upon this, at After Elton: http://www.afterelton.com/blog/michaeljensen/star-trek-fan-boys-react-set-phasers-to-whine ... after all these bloody years, you just don't believe it can still be going on ... homophobia among Trek fans. Still. Now. Forty years down the track. Incredible, isn't it?

What goes on, you ask? Well, there's a semi-pro fourth season of the original series (with Kirk, Spock, et al), in front of the cameras. Strictly non-profit, which is why Paramount turns the provebial blind eyes and deaf ears. But it's good enough that a couple of the original actors (Takei and Koenig) have been in episodes, and David Gerrold -- out gay screenwriter to whom we can credit some of the best Trek shows, including the iconic Trouble with Tribbles -- has reworked an old script into something new -- and, from where I'm sitting, terrific -- for the current show.

The story so far (in a thimble) is that Gene Roddenberry planned a spinoff show with Kirk, Spock et all, called Star Trek: Phase II. It was nothing to do with the Next Generation, and would have been shot in something like the eary 1970s. One of the episodes developed for that show was "Blood and Fire" by David Gerrold. The show was never made, but when the semi-pro crew got going with Phase II, the producer (who also plays the part of James T Kirk in the show) had the presence of mind to contact Gerrold and ask if there was any chance of the old episode being reworked and ... filmed.

Intrigued? So was I. Now, to be perfectly candid, I haven't yet see any of the Phase II shows. The last Trek I watched was about half of Voyager, before work and travel got in the way -- I still haven't seen most of it. I also missed three-fourths of DS9 for the same reason. I've seen all the movies, and liked almost all of them. I grew up on classic Trek, but have to admit that the jingoism and Hollywood-ness of some of the 1960s-style episodes make them borderline unwatchable to me, now, today. So I'm pretty darned qualified to talk about this and say --

At last! At bloody last, after 40 years, A GAY TREK EPISODE HAS BEEN MADE! It's wonderful that this has been done; it's a tribute to Gerrold, and the producers of the show, and as soon as I have my computers set up properly again, I shall be downloading all these episodes (there are three or four so far, with Gerrold's episode being the third or fourth). But --

Right on cue, at least some of the fans responded to the gay storyline with the same old homophobia we've come to expect from Trek people. The producers, writers and actors might have dragged themselves into the epoch of human rights, but the fans are still saying things like this: "I think the episode would have been better without the gay scene. In fact, I think you could have replaced the Freeman character with a woman, and very little of the drama would be removed. Having the gay scene means, as a father, I’m not sure if my eight-year-old son should watch this episode. He’s seen and enjoyed all the others. I’ve never had to worry about screening anything Star Trek before. ... I also think the gay storyline is the least interesting thing about the episode." And this: "What the hell is with the two guys dry-humping each other?? I’m sorry, but I’ve just lost a TON of respect for the Phase Two guys. Pushing blatant homosexuality in our faces is NOT the kind of Star Trek I want to watch! >:o( Completely uncalled for and not in the spirit of Star Trek. Disgusting!!"
http://www.afterelton.com/blog/michaeljensen/star-trek-fan-boys-react-set-phasers-to-whine

Well ... shucks. Why am I surprised? So long as it's females being turned into sex objects ... for example the Borg lady with the superstructure that comes through the door ten minutes ahead of the rest of her ... it's all fine and dandy; but let a gay couple express affection, and it's "disgusting," is it? Hmmm. I wonder if this qualifies as "the language of hate."


Anyway, if you're interested, go over the the show's own site and check it out. (You can also download for free; the episodes are shared around via P2P. If you don't have a "P2P client," don't even think about paying money for a service. Download Opera: it has P2P client software onboard.)

Here's the new Trek show's own page: http://www.startreknewvoyages.com/, and here is the Opera page, to get the browser with the built-in P2P routine: http://www.opera.com/

A quick word to Aussie fans: if you want these shows, or at least the gay episode(s), get in fast, because when "the Great Aussie Firewall" goes up in about two weeks, P2P is probably going to be inaccessible to Australians. The government and critics are calling it a "BitTorrent" lockout, but "BitTorrent" is more than likely a generic term. I should think they mean "P2P" as a whole. In which case, loads of sites are going to go invisible and stay that way, very soon. Now, that's what I call disgusting.

More on the Aussie Internet censorship here: http://mel-keegan.blogspot.com/2008/12/christmas-is-here-internet-filtering-is.html
and especially here:
http://mel-keegan.blogspot.com/2008/12/save-internet-get-into-petition.html

Ciao for now,
MK

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Marketing gay books online ... the challenge!

I was asked just recently if there's any real difference between marketing gay books online and any other kind of book. In fact, there's quite a gulf of difference, and you have to take that extra bit of care which writers of most other works don't.

If you've written the most crash-hot book on building garden sheds that has ever been produced in any language, including Ancient Greek, you'll have a comparatively easy time marketing it. Which isn't to say that it's dead easy to market any book, anywhere, at any time! But your book falls into an absolutely clear-cut category, and there shouldn't be one word in it which could be misconstrued by anyone, from any corner of the demograph. Your book shouldn't have the potential to offend anyone, anywhere.

Likewise, Elizabeth's Big Book of Brilliant Sweater Patterns; Tom's Top Tips on Classic Car Collecting, My First Treasury of Cheesecake Recipes, Auntie Aggie's All-American Anthology of Aggravating Armadillos ... and so on.

Fiction is different. Any kind of fiction. Fiction is about people doing ... stuff. And as soon as anyone does anything, someone else is going to have a complaint to make about it.

Jack's eating a cheese burger with extra bacon, fries and a Coke. Jill's a vegetarian, and grossed out. Bob's a health food aficionado, and grossed out. Ahmed is grossed out by the bacon strips, because of something the Koran says. Roger is grossed out by the beef content, because he's protesting the inhumane conditions endured by domestic cattle in the US. Joyce is grossed out by the dairy content, for the same reason. Sam is grossed out because he's lactose intolerant and basically, any mention of dairy makes him puke. Maria is grossed out by the Coke, because she's a diabetic, and any mention of sugar-water makes her come over dizzy and nauseated.

All Jack did was eat a burger. It was a dead boring scene in the book.

Supposing the plot got halfway interesting: he's having an extra-marital affair with the next-door neighbor, who's a single mum working nights at Hooters to pay the bills. Christians are going to be grossed out by the adultery. Muslims will be grossed out by both the adultery and the lady's lascivious profession. Welfare workers will be grossed out because her kids have a stripper for a mom. Feminists will be grossed out because Jack's two-timing his wife for the pneumatic Barbie doll next door.

Now, suppose Jack was gay, as well as eating the burger and having a clandestine affair with the gorgeous dude next door.

Suddenly, you have a book which is absolutely guaranteed to rub some people the wrong way, and do it biiiig big time. The fact is, as soon as the writer introduces "mature content" or themes to a work of fiction, it has to be marketed differently. Add in a gay element, and you give yourself a challenge...

When you're registering your book at Amazon, you have to choose your categories, and you're in a bind. You obviously choose Literature/fiction as a place to start; then, they offer you a very wide list of thematic material ... unless your book is gay.

If there's a gay element, you're automatically shoehorned into the Gay/lesbian pigeonhole. You're not science fiction, you're not historical, you're not romance or western or anything else. Well, yes you are, but your main content is of absolutely secondary importance to the gay element.

And there's an excellent reason for this. Many gay books (most of them, perhaps) are "gay enough" that there is absolutely no question of what they're about. But there are also books like my own, and they're tougher to categorize.

Sure, they're gay. Every one of them has at least two gay or bi central characters, and some of them have a whole group. There will always be gay issues discussed and lived through. There'll also be scenes of gay sensuality at the heart of the gay romance that drives most of my plots ...

But a lot of these books are also hard science fiction. Half a dozen are historicals. Two are vampire historicals. Several are fantasies. Some of the SF tales also qualify as hardboiled detective stories. Several are massive adventure romps. And all of them would qualify as romances.

The tendency, at least for me, is to wax poetic about the broad, technicolor canvas on which I "paint" these stories; to talk about the locations (which might be the Caribbean, Australia, Europe, Alaska...) or the ships or aircraft, whatever. As a writer and a reader both, the "gay aspect" of the story is, to me, only one facet of the story ... and, in fact, it's the part of the book that's probably the easiest to craft.

You have two gorgeous guys. Could be four: THE SWORDSMAN has two couples -- Jack and Seb, plus Janos and Luc; HELLGATE has Travers and Curtis, also Dario and Tor ... also Richard and that little prick, Tonio; and Mick Vidal. The relationships of all these people interweave, get complicated, sort themselves out again. They get together, they have differences, they argue, make up, and so forth. That's life -- and it's the simplest part of any book to write, because every human shares these experiences. We're all on the same page.

So, from my own perspective, I tend to focus on the areas of the work where I put in the most hard labor, either in research or invention. Worldbuilding. Researching a place on this globe where I've never been and have no chance of going (Myanmar, for one). Or, looking ahead to a time when the comet or asteroid him the planet, tearing the climate to shreds and rebuilding a livable environment (WINDRAGE; AQUAMARINE).

If I were marketing the books single-handedly, I might have blundered into strife by now, because I'd be enthusing about the locations, the adventure aspect, the ships, the high-tech, what have you, and there's the faint but real possibility that someone might buy one of these books in error.

Let's say you have a 16 year old surfer reading all this fantastic stuff on the website about the NARC high-tech and outrageous adventure on the high frontier. Cool. But in fact these books are not supposed to land in the hands of underage readers, because they're also gay books, and they can be explicit in their language, thematic devices and (!) sensuality.

Marketing has to be pellucidly clear, to make sure old Aunt Maud doesn't get hold of something that's so blisteringly hot, it ought to be handled with fire gloves. Straight or gay -- doesn't matter. Auntie M. will be off to the nearest emergency room with a coronary. (Incidentally, times change appearances. The book cover at left does NOT indicate lesbian content. "Gay" also means joyous, and this cover from 1936 is about young heterosexual females who ... just wanna have fun.)

And Marketing has to be extremely clear about gay content, because certain readers can either enjoy or turn the page to get past sensual hetero material, but the instant the material tends toward the gay ... the same readers are not just disinterested, they're actually offended.

Now, a number of my books are certainly in the "no underage readers, thank you very much!" bracket. I'd put the NARC series there, plus ICE, WIND AND FIRE, and also WHITE ROSE OF NIGHT; possibly WINDRAGE and BREAKHEART.

But there's also a slough more which I'd rate "okay for mature older teens who're gay, bi or gay-friendly." THE SWORDSMAN, THE DECEIVERS, TIGER, TIGER, and such like.

But these decisions are not mine to make. There's a big, gray area where folks of all ages are muddling around together ... the younger reader who's desperately hunting for porn because s/he's already addicted to sleaze, and the 40 year olds who've been so sheltered, profanity and nudity make them faint.

Until you're 18 (or maybe even 21, depending on your region ) what you can read is the decision of your parents, your preachers, your teachers. Over that age, you're pretty much on your own. You must make your own decisions about what gets put into your brain, but --

It's up to the folks responsible for marketing the books to give you clear indications of what's in said books, so the decision ... to buy or not to buy? ... can be made in all good conscience.

To some people, the mere mention of the word "gay" or "queer" in a piece of work will immediately rate the book R. (Like this blog, believe it or not. Keegan is rated R, for speaking candidly about reality, though there is no nudity or profanity anywhere in these posts. Go figure.)


In fact, a hint of gayness in a book aimed at children will make a lot of adults go ballistic. It's actually quite amusing. Mom and Dad are running around like a couple of headless chickens, having heart attacks about what's in the little book, and the kids are saying, "Mom, Dad, they're gay, get over it."

We have a long, long way to go before a book like, say, DANGEROUS MOONLIGHT will be classified as a historical, simply with an asterisk that offers, "Be aware of same-gender content, characters and romance." Right now, DANGEROUS MOONLIGHT, FORTUNES OF WAR, THE DECEIVERS ... they're gay books with an asterisk offering, "be aware of historical setting and themes." Spin the treatment though 180 degrees and you glimpse the absurdity.

So, yes, it's very different marketing gay books than "any other kind" of books. You really do become aware of being hammered into a category ... politically marginalized. Gayness was never an issue when plotting, writing, jacketing and publishing, but the instant marketing starts -- yup, it's a challenge. You have to sit down and figure out how to get these books in front of people who enjoy 1) a good gay read irrespective of whether it's historical, SF or fantasy; and/or 2) a good book in a specific genre, irrespective of the fact it has gay characters or themes.

Take the NARC books as an example. Many readers are gay guys. Many are straight women who enjoy a good story about gay guys. Some are lesbians who enjoy the stories for their own sake and the gender freedoms I describe. And a few are straight guys who get a huge kick out of the powerful science fiction futures I describe, and at the same time are liberal-minded enough not to get all bent out of shape by the gay aspect.

The trick is in making every aspect of the books pellucidly clear, so that readers can make up their own minds about what they're buying. Marketing on the Internet is not as easy by a long shot as putting books into a store and leaving readers to browse and thumb-through, and choose. But it can be done.

A good place to start is with the cover: you can usually give some clear clues about what the book's going to contain ... and when a book is going to be sold via Amazon (where a tiny fragment of textual description is given, and the front cover only), the jacketing becomes critical. Errors could be made via the Amazon marketplace -- and I imagine they sometimes are.

This is something we'd like to avoid at all costs, sooo...

DANGEROUS MOONLIGHT, WHITE ROSE OF NIGHT, WINDRAGE and a couple of others will have to be rejacketed into a new edition specifically for this reason, before they "go up" to Amazon. It's a little extra work which will surely pay dividends in the end.

It'll also keep us busy for a while!
Ciao for now,
MK

Friday, October 10, 2008

Digital cameras - which is best, and for whom?

Today I'll be answering two readers' questions, both of them good, and well worth answering on the blog here.

I can satisfy in a paragraph; the second will take a good bit longer:

Q: When will HELLGATE be finished?
A: 2009. All of it, right to the end. The whole series will be finished and out in paperbacks and ebooks by Christmas '09, and you'll also be able to buy it in three big hardcovers, if you want something swank for your bookshelf. Makes a hell of a gift, too. We'll also be able to offer a package, where you can order all the ebooks in one Zip archive, at a special price. Lulu.com doesn't do package deals or gift vouchers yet, but they might start offering this, in the next twelve months. Also (and this is breaking news -- we won't even be making a big announcement for a few days yet), Keegan is in the process of going to Amazon.com. At last. So in 2009 you might be able to get some kind of bulk deal with Amazon, who do offer gift vouchers and so forth. (The Amazon trade paperback editions will be produced by CreateSpace.com, not Lulu.com -- but we WILL be keeping the Lulu editions up too, because the CreateSpace editions are very expensive for Aussie and Kiwi readers ... not the books, the postage. More about this later.)

Next -- the important question:

DIGITAL CAMERAS - which would I recommend?

The question was fired at me because I spent years as a professional photographer, back in the days of optical and film. I've made the transfer to digital of necessity ... optical became vastly too expensive, and I like to grab up to 1000 frames on one "shoot" and sort them out later. With digital, this just means a couple of full flashcards. With optical, it means 40 rolls of film, which would cost upwards of five hundred bucks ... sorry, Kodak, but I've got better things to spend money on these days. Like, a whole new camera for that price.

So, which camera are you going shopping for?

It's a simple question to ask, but a lot more complex to answer. I'll try to be brief. Which camera is the "best" depends on two basic questions: 1) What you want it to do; 2) What your budget is.

If you're a wannabe professional (I won't say pro here, because if you're a pro, you're not asking this question, nor as you reading this post: you already know the answers!), you need to get a digital SLR with the best computerized body and power system you can afford, plus one or more lenses suited to your line of work.
Sports and wildlife photography demand long lenses. You'll want something in the 1000mm range ... and the bad news is, the lens could easily cost more than the camera body. Model photography (meaning young people in scanty clothes, rather than Tamaya and Airfix planes and tanks!) demands very sharp lenses with a zoom in the 25mm - 300mm range (wide angle to moderate telephoto). This lens would also go a long way towards doubling as news photography equipment, but it's too short for wildlife, and too limited to do well at air shows. Equestrian and grand prix events are within its capacity, though, so long as you're careful and know what you're doing.

What brand do I recommend, if you're shopping for a top-end camera with a view to selling your work? For myself, I'd go with Canon or Pentax, though other professionals recommend Nikon. In fact, it's "six of one, half a dozen of the other." Depends what you're familiar with.
As a ground rule, get the BEST camera body you can possibly afford. Also, as a general rule, don't buy a second hand digital SLR body, because you can't know if it's been dropped, hit, drowned or cooked. Heat, moisture and impacts hurt the electronics. They can "go intermittent" and work, sorta-kinda, for some time after the accident ... long enough for them to find their way onto the secondhand gear shelf, and into the hands of an unsuspecting newbie. Buy new, as per the body ... look at secondhand to save money on the lenses.
(Very good lenses will be starting to change hands around now, because there isn't a lot of work for professional photographers these days; and everyone, everywhere, bar none, is feeling the pinch. A top of the range, 1000mm lens could cost (!) five grand. Used ... I'd look at $2000-$2500 as a decent price. But shop around -- and don't forget to look for Internet specials.

On the other hand...

If you're a semi-pro or keen amateur, you could do a hell of a lot worse than look at the top digitals, just short of the SLR bracket. You're looking for 6 megapixels or better, and a 10:1 optical zoom, or better.
TIP: Don't pay money for big digital zooms, because all the camera is doing is electronically enhancing pixels in-camera ... something you can do at home, with fantastic FREE software like Irfanview ... http://www.irfanview.com/ ... Pay money for extra pixels in the capture and/or display, or features such as manual focus, a bigger, sharper screen, a wider range of exposures and virtual film-speeds, the ability to shoot 640x480 video, and record sound. In-camera editing is not worth extra bucks, when you're going right home (or back to the hotel) and will be loading the whole shoot onto the computer.

Makes and models? When you're up around the 6-8 megapixel range, they're all pretty much of a sameness, so you need to look at features, price, and also the comfort factor. How does it fit your hand? Is it too heavy? Is it too small? What do YOU feel comfortable with?



The camera that fits my hand the best is the Fuji FinePix S6500fd. It has 6MP, a 2.5" screen, a 10.7 optical zoom, an extremely crisp lens, and manual focus. The downsides are, it takes XD cards which, being Olympus proprietorial technology, are a good deal more expensive than other cards ... and it's noticeably heavy -- a lot heavier than the 5500 model (I have one of those too), which feels like a feather by comparison! For me, the extra weight is a a good trade-off, because the manual focus makes possible photos we thought we'd never get again, since we laid our optical SLRs to rest. The 6500 has gadgets and features galore, some of which are useful, some of which are "touristy" stuff which you won't use. It's also robust: I confess to having bounced mine several times, and stood on it once (accidentally!) and it's none the worse for wear.

Price-wise, you can turn one up for about $500, which makes it the best dollar-value, in my own experience. (It's little brother, the 5500 -- with 5MP and a smaller screen, and no real manual focus -- is available at about $350. If you can't use a heavy camera, look at the 5500.)



If you can afford to go to about $700 or so, do take a look at the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18, which has 8 MP and an 18x optical zoom, and uses SD cards, which are cheaper. The camera is a beauty, though stuffed with touristy features which you're paying for though you might never use them; and it's a little small. For those of us who are used to the "feel" of a big SLR body, and can therefore handle the Fuji comfortably, the Panasonic Lumix could take some getting used to. However, one drools over the Leica lens! The camera is not quite as sturdy as the Fuji ... you can also get it in silver as well as black. To me, cameras are black, so I've pasted in the catalog pic that shows this little number in black.

As per examples of the work from these two cameras, I can't show you anything from the Panasonic Lumix, but I can certainly show you a good cross-section of work from the Fuji ... and I'll be doing this tomorrow, since for today, I just ran out of time!



Ciao for now,
MK

Monday, September 8, 2008

Was it an AC/DC ice age?

When you're writing a big fantasy novel, trying to give it full justice (not just churn out another hack-em-up story about evil wizards, axe-wielding barbarians, sensuality in exotic locations, battling demons, monsters and ... the usual fare), your mind goes off in some weird and wonderful directions.

Bear with me, while I elaborate! THE LORDS OF HARBENDANE is set in a kind of "parallel Earth" which could be contemporary with our time, or could be 50,000 years in the past: it's impossible to tell, because (as I said a few posts ago) the events triggering the shift in the parallel timestreams between their world and ours happened so long ago, it actually decided where tectonics would go, and ocean rising patterns. In other words, even their land masses are different, though it's clearly the same planet: the sun, the moon, gravity, the general climate, animals and vegetation, the human genome ... all the same.

So this world clearly evolved along the same lines (a horse is a horse, a grape vine still produces fermentable fruit ...), so it's a safe bet that the process of evolution itself is the same.

Now, LORDS has a technology about even with Europe's middle fifteen century: steel, textiles, glass, architecture, lathing, intensive agriculture, road building, paper, bookbinding ... no steam or electricity yet, but they know their chemistry.

Setting the technology gives you a good grasp of what the culture would look like, on a superficial level: these people don't dress in bearskins and live in caves; they're well dressed and shod, carry fine swords, live in sophisticated buildings, have domesticated their animals ...

But the development of political structure, mythology and spirituality, philosophy and art, morality and sexuality, are only tangentially connected to the evolution of technology -- and the jury is still out as per the relationship between the two. Does one drive the other? If so, which one is driving? Theories abound, and that's still all they are: theories.

So, going through THE LORDS OF HARBENDANE again ... rewriting, adding to, cutting from, polishing, renaming things according to newly-set lingual rules ... I soon found myself thumping my head against a question which has always been there, for every human being; but few people ever notice it, much less tackle it.

Evolution was designed by Mama Nature to create the best, biggest, strongest, smartest critter, which would inherit the planet. The mechanism of evolution is simple: "sex+time+death" ... critters share chromosomes, raise kids, and proptly kick the bucket to make way for the next generation; repeat process over 750,000 years, and a whole new species will be created.

So, how in the hell did the "gay gene" develop? (This makes the assumption that being gay is genetic ... the research is still unfinished, but something is *probably* going on in a bunch of DNA known as Xq28, we just don't know what (yet) and it's so damned expensive to do this research, it could be a looooong time before we know anything for sure. (And in any case, who wants to know? Am I the only one with the squirmy feeling that if "they" can trace being gay to a gene, "they" can develop a therapy and a "cure" ...?)

The Natural History of Homosexuality is a book you could see on the shelves in another five or ten years -- with David Attenborough narrating its documentary series for BBC2, explaining how Homo Habilis, and Homo Erectus (I kid you not; look him up), Neanderthals and Cro Magnons had a developing society 100,000 years before anyone twigged to the fact that it's sex between men and women that (!) makes babies.

Now, before folks made that fine distinction, what earthly objection could people have had to the fact that maybe 10% of people chose to settle down and build a nest with people of their own gender? Surely, the objection of the community at large to its gay component came about when the god emperors and pharaohs realized that they needed to breed up big, new armies -- it was an era when battlefield deaths could account for fifty thousand men in a single day. Again, look it up. Believe what they show you in ALEXANDER and TROY and GLADIATOR, and so forth.

It makes sense (at least to me) that the god emperors would forbid a person to be gay, on pain of death, because they need bodies for the army. Then along come the "true faith" religions (arising in the exact same location as the god kings with their monstrous armies), and they cemented the whole thing into place. Fast forward 2000 years, and we're still trying to get out from under the yoke of oppression that began when Hamurabi or Ramses, or whomever, had to be able to throw a hundred thousand men into a massive battle -- and then, less than a generation later, do it again.

Where this line of thinking is going, is this: today's surviving homophobia is the result of the empire building in the ancient world, with their cynical, man-made laws which were later concreted in by the "true faith" religions which still set the patterns of our own world.

(The prejudice against, and oppression of, women could be traced to the same root cause: enslave 'em and keep 'em pregnant ... bodies for the army. And also, prior to people knowing that it's sex between different genders that makes babies, there would have been nada, zero, nothing to be gained from oppressing women. Duh.)

Now, against this, you've got evolution still working in the background ... but Mama Nature was never interested in empire building. She just wants to make bigger, better, faster, stronger, smarter individuals. Okay: gays don't have so many kids, but -- Nature being Nature -- the gay component of the community at large is only ever quite small. So the expression of gay genes is restricted to a quite small sub-community which bumbles on happily in the background for millennia...

Until one day something called "the homophobe's paradox" raises its peculiar head. Now ... I'm not sure if I believe a word of this, and it's NOT my idea. But I have to admit, it's worth thinking about because it does make a weird kind of sense --

However, it's not the paradox itself I want to direct your attention to in the following outtake from an article in DISCOVER ... it's the response to it, which nailed the absolute truth with such accuracy, it's as if a searchlight turned on. If I might therefore direct you to the second of these two paragraphs...!

    The model shows that over centuries an effect you might call the homophobe’s paradox has been at work on the human genome: The more intolerant the society, the more likely it is to maintain gay genes. If a society’s conventions keep homosexuals in the closet, then they will be more likely to conform, get married, and have children. This is especially true if gay genes are also responsible for making women more fecund. Imagine, for instance, that for every extra child that such a gay gene–carrying woman has, a gay man can have one fewer and the balance necessary for the survival of the gene is still maintained. The more children he has, thanks to what his contemporaries demand of him, the less evolutionary pressure there is for his female counterpart to have more. “As a society becomes more intolerant, there’s more pressure to have offspring,” says Gavrilets. “The real [evolutionary] cost of being homosexual isn’t too big if you’re forced to have kids.” On the other hand, the more tolerant the society, the more gay men can be free to be who they are, so the more likely they will be childless—and the more difficult it will be for any female in the family to make up for the loss.

    “Bullshit,” says Bocklandt. “A mathematical model is a nice exercise, a mental masturbation about how these things could work, but it makes better sense to do that once we know a bit more. One of the problems that none of the mathematical models take into account is that we have no idea what it meant to be gay 10,000 years ago. We have some idea what it meant 200 years ago but not 10,000.”

      [Source: DISCOVER Magazine - Mind & Brain / Sex & Gender: "The Real Story on Gay Genes" link]

You see the searchlight going on? In a world before the god emperors and the massive armies ... in a world before anyone knew what alchemy made a baby ... in a society where there was nothing to be gained from oppressing women and forcing people to be heterosexual in order to keep up the baby boom, bodies for the army ...

How much d'you wanna bet that about 10,000 years ago, before the dawn of writing (which means we'll never know the truth, because no one was writing it down), there were some wild, exotic, potentially gorgeous societies. Robert E. Howard, who wrote the Conan stories, penned this line: "In the time before the oceans drank Atlantis, there was an age undreamed of."

Woah. I mean, seriously -- woah.

Now, excuse me, if I go get back into THE LORDS OF HARBENDANE!

And now, some completely gratuitous pictures ... because I feel like it ... but you take my meaning, right? (Photos are all production and publicity still from ALEXANDER and acknowledged as such. Click on an image for a larger view.)





And just to make sure your sense of spacetime is thoroughly stuffed up for the remainder of the day:

One final, parting goodie: if you're interested in the human journey, from our ancestral primate beginnings to who we are (biologically speaking) today, don't miss this:

The Journey of Mankind.

Have a good one,
MK

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Rising to the challenge

Regular visitors to the main website have known for eons, you can send questions through Ask Mel ... and I get some beauties.

A little while ago I wrote a feature article taking a look at gay SF through the age -- literally, right back to the first gay SF story anyone knows, written by Lucian in the second century. (I think I've mentioned the article somewhere on the blog, but even I can't recall where, so here's the link: Gay SF: MK takes a fresh look.)

Apparently, the prospect of an SF story from the mists of time is tough for some readers to swallow, so I'm here with the provenance! Give this a click, and see where you land:

Homosexuality in speculative fiction.

This is the part you'll be on the lookout for:

    True History by the Greek writer Lucian (A.D. 120-185) has been called the first ever gay science fiction story.[5] The narrator is suddenly enveloped by a typhoon and swept up to up to the moon, which is inhabited by a society of men that are at war with the sun. After distinguishing himself in combat, the king gives the hero his son the prince in marriage. The all male society reproduces (male children only) by giving birth from the thigh or by growing a child from a plant produced by planting the left testicle in the moon's soil.

[SOURCE: www.powerset.com : Homosexuality in speculative fiction]

[also, click the pic for a larger, readable captioning]

...and if you want to keep going, you'll eventually land here: The works of Lucian of Samosata. Notice, you have a contents list; look under "Volume II."

You're welcome. And yes, I've read it ... not only that, but (!) you can too.

Powerset is something new, and I like it. It's not a new wiki (thank gods), but a fresh take on the interface via which the existing Wikipedia can be accessed. It's clean, more linear, and "immediate" ... like a marriage between Google and Wikipedia.

I've come to know a little about Wikipedia lately, because very soon (and I shudder as I even imagine this) I have to knuckle down to a horrific task. You can go to Wikipedia and search on Mel Keegan, and get nada. Zip. Zero. Nuth'n.

Now, that can't be right. I'm sitting here typing, sneezing out what few brain cells remain in my skull (springtime in the Antipodes), wondering if I get get through this afternoon's edit of the next segment of THE LORDS OF HARDENDANE and also get the notes for a new story down, *and* look at some webpages for DreamCraft, *and* contribute something to to the newsletter that should be going out either this afternoon or tomorrow ... which would be good going, since it's already two o'clock.

So I'm definitely here; but Wikipedia doesn't know it. I mean, they have 121,437 articles listed for "science fiction writers," and Keegan ain't one of them.

Naturally enough, it'll be 121438 articles before long, the last of them being something about this weird Aussie scribbler who writes stuff like NARC and HELLGATE. The problem is, Wikipedia has gotten so big, so complex and so hemmed in by its own red tape (which, I know, I know, is the only way they can keep out spammers, vandals and character assassins), that it's become a seven-headed beast.

To get a really solid Wikipedia "presence" for this indie publishing effort is going to entail a lot of work; not just the writing and uploading, but also learning the system, how it functions (and doesn't), what you're supposed to do (and not), to keep everyone smiling.

The truth is, I've wanted to get into Wikipaedia for two or three years now, and have never had the time to take this particular brute by the horns and wrestle it down. And here's the kicker: the longer I put it off, the bigger and more labyrinthine the system is getting.

Speaking purely as a user, Wikipedia is terrific, so long as you're of a slightly academic bent (or a somewhat bent academic). However, the Powerset interface is cleaner, clearer, smoother. I'm pretty sure the ordinary visitor will enjoy the Powerset presentation more than the original. It's like the difference between a text book and a magazine. The content might well be the same; the presentation is rather different.

And speaking as a wannabe contributor, I admit, Wikipedia has become daunting. It'll be a little while before I can get my teeth into it, but ... I'll get there. I'd like to do a basic "bio" page, with a booklist, and then have a page for the NARC books, and the HELLGATE books, the historicals, and so forth. Then, I'm pretty sure I ought to get Keegan onto the pages for gay writers, gay books, gay fiction, gay science fiction, general sf, independent publishing ... and so on, and on, and on.

Mammoth job. Herculean task. Next week. Month. Uh ... year. 2009 sounds just fine. I know it has to be done, but this is one time when I could easily contend for the title "Last of the Procrastinators."

Wikis are becoming very popular lately, along with "self help" sites. I stumbled into something called www.squidoo.com just yesterday. Good gods.

My work ethic is nagging at me now, and LORDS OF HARBENDANE is waiting, along with a load more to be done so --

Ciao for now,
MK

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Sundry Sunday miscellany

Sunday finds me working on LORDS OF HARBENDANE, and taking half hour out right here to answer some readers' questions.

This first, from a lady in Toronto, Canada: when the [expletive deleted] will the rest of HELLGATE be putting in an appearance?! Good question, with a simple answer: soon, because I'm doing the prep work for the entire rest of the series at this time. Right now, I do believe I'm cutting seven books to six, and just as I wrote CRY LIBERTY and PROBE back to back, I'll be doing the last two the same way. They'll be released singly, a few months apart, and I'm hoping to get them out in 2009. Afterwards, we have a pet project: the six HELLGATE books will be partnered by twos, and you'll be able to buy the whole lot in three big hardcovers which will look amazing on your bookshelf. (Few science fiction novels/series look like that ... and it's an absolute first in gay publishing. Three monstrous hardcovers, being a 2,200 page epic tale of love, war, espionage, death, high technology, survival, freedom and friendship? I'm actually racking my brains to think of any other such project. There's a number of big, huuuuuge fantasy novels ... the Wheel of Time, for one. But nothing similar, in hard SF. And absolutely nothing in gay SF or fantasy. Let me get this done, guys, and we'll make some history here.)

Next, from a gent in the UK: does the NARC riot armor look like the suit in IRON MAN? Actually ... no. Which is not the same as saying I don't really like Tony Stark's design -- I do. However, the NARC armor is very different. To begin with, it doesn't have a "face" on the helmet; the visor is featureless. Floodlights and sensor packs are concealed in a smooth fairing around the helmet. The NARC armor is mirror-black; there's a powerpack mounted between the shoulders, containing a superconductor unit. Those shoulders are big -- think ice hockey pads in mirror black. The joints are "smart seals" so you don't have massive, "swollen" elbow and knee assemblies ... when you put it on, piece by piece, the armor's joints nano-seal themselves, as securely as welds. I would love to be able to tell you I know exactly what the NARC armor looks like, but all I can tell you, really, is ... what it doesn't look like. I had an absolute blast at IRON MAN, and I like the armor a lot. But the NARC armor is very different. We're still working to get a design I, uh, like.

Next, this from a very nice reader who wants to know, would I take on an editing job? In fact (sorry) I have to say no. Editing is an incredibly time-consuming job, and at even minimum-wage rates, it gets very expensive. No writer trying to crack the market can afford to pay so much, and also, if you do shell out and pay a pro to do the work, you don't learn nearly as much as if you did the job yourself. I realize it could take months to learn this job, but at the end of that time you still have your money, and you've assembled a suite of skills which will benefit you the rest of your writing life.

The other downside to editing is that writers (especially new ones) can get very upset during the process, when it often seems there's something wrong with every second word. Someone once said, it takes a million words of creative fiction under the belt before one's work will be "good enough." This is not true; but the gist of it is ... it takes a hell of a lot of very hard work and practise to reach the point where the writing is (and I hate the term) "good enough" to pass muster in the pro arena.

Is there a study course I would recommend? Again, not really. There are hundreds out there; pick the one that suits you best, at a price you can afford. One word of caution: beware of the "we want to read your novel," and "get published fast and easy" type ads. You can be in print by next week, and you don't need to drop five hundred bucks to one of these companies to achieve this result! What none of these schemes guarantee is that anyone will buy your book; or, if you do get buyers, that your work has been polished to the point where it's ready to "fly solo." If it's not ready, this kind of "automatic self-publishing scheme" is a recipe for disaster. Sorry to be a killjoy.

It's much better to work with a smaller group -- a writers' workshop or a circle of friends -- until you're sure of your skills, *then* give the pro market a shot. There's almost certainly a writers' workshop in your area. Your local library would know -- and might even be the meeting place for one. It often happens. Writing for a group gives you the chance to bounce your work of other people before you have to start putting down a lot of money. When you're in Aus or NZ, a submission to a publisher in London or New York will cost upwards of $100. You have to print out, airmail, and pay return shipping on the whole 300-400pp manuscript. This is something that can wait till you're pretty sure of your skills. When you KNOW how good you are -- time enough, then, to start putting money into the project. Even if you're lucky enough to be close to the world's publishing capitals, it can still get expensive, especially if you blunder into an "editing agent" who wants $75 per hour, and more, to edit for you. The bottom line is this: the better you are before you run the gauntlet of these people, the easier it'll be and the less it will cost. By all means take a course. Also, find a writers' workshop or similar, and have some fun along the way.

And now, back to THE LORDS OF HARBENDANE. It's a cold but sunny Sunday, and everything in the world is in bloom, leaving you with fuzzy eyes and sneezes. I'll leave you with these images, which illustrate what I mean:



Thursday, August 21, 2008

And on the seventh day --

KDO: acronym - Keegan's Day Off. And it's more like the fourteenth day since I took one off! AND it it shouldn't count, because I'm still walking like Galen (see yesterday's post), getting conversant with the floor ... and what use is a day off when you have a bad back? That's not a day off, it's what is called, in this country, a Sickie. (As clearly distinct from a Ciggie, which is a cigarette.)

Thanks to those who kindly mentioned yesterday's Planet of the Apes humor ... yes, I was always a big fan of the concept, going back to the original Charlton Heston movie, which I saw as a wee little tyke. The tv series of the 1970s was actually quite well done -- esp. when you consider what they had to do on a tv budget and weekly schedule. Makes you shudder.

The 2001 Tim Burton remark was terrific ... and I don't actually give much of a stuff about what the critics say about it (I know they hated it unanimously). I grew up with Apes movies, and as per critics as a subspecies of mankind ... I do believe I established, about a dozen posts ago, how ridiclous the whole field of film criticism is (see this post, apropos of Beowulf). With Tim Burton's POTA, the little bast-dears are at it again. Here's an unutterably stupid comment from film critic on Tiscali: "While the stunning make-up failed to disguise Tim Roth's sadistic enjoyment in the role of Thade, Wahlberg seems altogether too real to operate in such a fictitious world although his understated strength at least gave his character some credibility." Say, what? I wonder what this individual made of 300, and The Dark Knight?? Now, shoot over to scifi.com and hear Tim Roth on the subjec: "I think the whole [scenario] is funny. We would step back occasionally, me and Paul [Giamatti] and just laugh ourselves silly because it truly is absurd." In other words (before I shut up about the whole subject) every single one of us has a completely unique way of seeing anything at all ... but, usually, only critics get to foist their uniqueness (read: utter subjectivity) on the public, AND get paid for it, AND have a fair percentage of unsuspecting readers take what they read as gospel. [sound of barfing]

For those who liked the Apes movies, here's a good interview: Director Tim Burton and cast have a big adventure reinventing Planet of the Apes, and for everyone else --

Onward to other subjects!

(But, lunch first. Like the man said in the movie, "I'll be back.")

Pasting in the link to scifi.com reminded me of another interview I read there, a little while ago -- their interview with Samuel R. Delaney, who has become rather iconified in the field of ... I won't say "gay SF," but rather, "experimental gender and human relationship SF." It's a very good interview on may levels. Delaney speaks about his life experiences as a writer, a creator of speculative fiction, and a professional author in the 1970s, when SF underwent its epiphany, and its revolution.

Is anyone else reading this old enough to remember the New Wave?! You may not believe it, but put away somewhere ... plastic-wrapped and packed flat ... I still have some issues of the English magazine, NEW WORLDS. It was a newspapaper sized magazine, with humungous pages, and no binding ... so, the color printing came out of the mgazine like so many posters. And the stories -- woah. Weird.

One of the most refreshing areas of the New Wave was the simple fact you could talk about sex and display the "undraped human form" and not be shoveled into the same pile of stuff as the porn rags. Sexuality had, by that point, gained a kind of respectability; the inclusion of sensual material in a story did not get the whole thing labeled as porn.

But, going back to Samuel R. Delaney's interview, the discussion regarding DAHLGHREN is interesting, even though SRD didn't seem to want to settle down and talk about the novel in much depth. At the time it was published, it was contentious to the point of being difficult to publish, not merely because it was one of the first sorta-kind-mainstream books to tackle being gay, but because it also didn't shilly-shally and beat around any bushes -- it was specific and explicit about it. Also, it's a long book, even by today's standards at 800pp, and for an SF novel of its day (mid-70s-ish) it was monstrous.

And there were problems galore, apparently ... the sound you hear now is Keegan chuckling wickedly, because (aha, Eureka, and so forth) it turns out I'm not alone in being victimized by the Universe (!). "IT" has happened to someone else too!

The "IT" I'm referring to is the thing which has been the flea in my ear since 1999: AQUAMARINE went to press without being proofread or copy edited. There have been times when I really did think I was the only serious writer this had happened to. Not so. Let me give you a quote from the very end of the interview with Samuel R. Delaney -- and then I'll give you the link to go over an read the whole interview...
    Scifi.com: But you've been continually correcting typos, as can be seen by your essays on it and published correspondence in 1984 and elsewhere. Getting a more perfect Dhalgren has been more difficult than getting a more perfect Babel-17.

    Delany: Often that's just different publishers. Dhalgren is so large that it's more difficult. Some books come out with remarkably fewer typographical errors than others. Dhalgren had more than its share from the very, very beginning. I was never sent the copyedited manuscript to read. Dhalgren, when it was a manuscript, it went off, and the next thing I got were galleys, so I never had the copyedited manuscript. And I only had the galleys for four days. You try to correct 800 pages of galleys in four days; it's an undoable task. And given that that's how it was done, I think Bantam did a remarkably good job. But there were hundreds of errors in the initial publication. And slowly but surely they got it down to a reasonable number of errors. And when Wesleyan redid the book, again, it was done a little too fast, it was rushed and nobody proofread it, with the result that suddenly there were another hundred-odd errors that crept in. And Vintage is very nice. Most of the errors of correction at this point are done not by me, but by other people who call up and say, "Hey, on page 373, there's no period at the end of this sentence." And I look, and sure enough, they've left out a period.
[Source: SciFi.com, issue 217; Samuel R. delaney interviewed by Scott Edelman]

...sounds of wicked chuckling issue, once again, from Keegan!

And here's the link to the whole interview. It's a very good one:

Samuel R. Delany exposes the heart of Dhalgren over a naked lunch

Ciao for now,
MK